Set theory - chapter 1: Axioms of Set Theory

1.1

⇐ Trivial

⇒ Let ( a , b ) = ( c , d ) . We shall use the axiom of extensionality to prove a = c and b = d . Suppose one of the pair contains the same elements, for instance a = b . Then { { c } , { c , d } } is equal to { { a } } and so has one element. Hence { c } = { c , d } and the same argument gives c = d . Finally { { a } } = { { c } } and a = b = c = d . Otherwise, both sets have two elements. The elements of same cardinality are equal : { a } = { c } and { a , b } = { c , d } . The first equality gives a = c . Using this in the second equal, we get b = d .

1.2

Suppose that ( X ) X . Since X ( X ) we get X X which contradicts the axiom of regularity : S = { X } has no ∈-minimal element. Alternative proof (using result of chapter 3) : ( X ) X contradicts Cantor's theorem.

1.3

Let X be inductive and Y = x X x X . We shall show that Y is inductive :

If n then for all inductive set X , n X . By the previous result, Y X = x X x X is inductive thus n Y X and n X . Hence, n X X is inductive = and is transitive.

Now let n and Z n = m m < n . Clearly, Z n n by definition of <. Conversely, is transitive, n so n Z n . Finally n = Z n = m m < n .

1.4

Let X be inductive and Y = x X x transitive . X and is transitive so Y . Let y Y . Since X is inductive, y { y } X . If z y { y } the either z y or z = y . In the former case, z y by transitivity of y so z y { y } . In the latter case, z = y y { y } . Hence we showed that y { y } is transitive and y { y } Y . Finally, Y is inductive.

Let n and X be inductive. Then n Y X = x X x transitive . Hence n is transitive.

1.5

Let X be inductive and Y = x X x transitive and x x . We shall show that Y is inductive :

Now let n and X be inductive. Then n Y X so n n . But n n + 1 = n { n } so n n + 1 .

1.6

Let X be inductive and Y = { x X x is transitive and every nonempty z x has an ∈-minimal element } . We shall show that Y is inductive :

1.7

Let X be a nonempty set and n X . If n X = then n is clearly a ∈-minimal element of X and we are done.

Suppose that n X is nonempty. is inductive and its elements are transitive by 1.4. The set of all m such that every nonempty subset of m has an ∈-minimal element is inductive, so is itself. Hence the subset n X of n has an ∈-minimal element e . There is no x X such that x e , otherwise it would belong to n X by transitivity of n . Finally e is ∈-minimal in X .

1.8

Let X be inductive and Y = x X x = ( y x = y { y } ) . We shall show that Y is inductive :

Hence Y and for all n 0 there is y such that n = y { y } . We have y n so y . Finally n = y + 1 .

1.9 (Induction)

Suppose A and let x be ∈-minimal in \ A (such an element exists by 1.7). 0 A so x = y + 1 for some y . But y A for otherwise x would not be∈-minimal in \ A . Thus x = y + 1 A . A contradiction.

1.10

Let A = n n is T-finite . We shall show that A = by induction (1.9) i.e. every set is T-finite.

1.11

For all n , n + 1 = n { n } n shows that n not maximal. Hence ( ) has no ⊂-maximal element i.e. is T-infinite.

1.12

Let f : S n be 1-1 onto. Let X ( S ) a non-empty set. Then Y = f ( x ) x X ( n ) is non-empty and there exists a maximal e Y . But x , y X ( x y f ( x ) f ( y ) ) . Hence f 1 ( e ) is ⊂-maximal in X and S is T-finite.

1.13

Let S be infinite and X = u S u is finite . X is non-empty since X . Suppose X has an ⊂-maximal element e . Then S \ e and there exists x S \ e . Then y = e { x } e . A contradiction. Then S is T-infinite.

1.14

Let X , p be two sets and φ ( u , p ) be a formula. Let F = ( x , x ) φ ( x , p ) . By replacement, F ( X ) is set. x ( x F ( X ) ) ( x X φ ( x , p ) ) and the separation axiom holds for φ , X , p .

1.15

This page is W3C-compliant - Author: Frédéric WANG
Valid XHTML 1.1 Valid MathML 2.0 Valid SVG Valid CSS Amaya, the W3C browser/editor Firefox